Thank you Jason, I like the points you have made and agree that the other two points from Goodwin's assertions are harder to prove however some of the camera angles could be argued to be voyeristic or at least POV (notions of looking) I was hard pushed to recognise an intertexual reference, which doesn't mean there not there: perhaps neither of us get them!
Welcome back. This looks like a good way to manage my comments.
ReplyDeleteJason, you need to let me know which of Goodwin's conventions your video conforms with with examples please. Let me know as soon as it's ready.
ReplyDeleteThanks sir, the powerpoint is now uploaded.
ReplyDeleteThank you Jason, I like the points you have made and agree that the other two points from Goodwin's assertions are harder to prove however some of the camera angles could be argued to be voyeristic or at least POV (notions of looking) I was hard pushed to recognise an intertexual reference, which doesn't mean there not there: perhaps neither of us get them!
ReplyDelete